tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3498725671447004370.post9100328269509494095..comments2023-10-26T07:19:41.446-05:00Comments on Science Avenger: Secular does not Mean AtheisticScienceAvengerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00855046387193200080noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3498725671447004370.post-38862966271197516652008-05-27T13:58:00.000-05:002008-05-27T13:58:00.000-05:00That is nonsense at a very basic level. The two s...That is nonsense at a very basic level. The two subjects are not in any way logically connected, thus there is no reason one couldn't be true while the other is false.<BR/><BR/>The evidence that ID = creationism is considerable, including the Wedge Document, "cdesign proponentists" from the Of Pandas and People editing, and the fact that all the ID arguments are just rehashed creationist arguments.<BR/><BR/>The evidence that secularism is not atheism could end with two words: Barry Lynne.ScienceAvengerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00855046387193200080noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3498725671447004370.post-4363018342474362742008-05-26T16:05:00.000-05:002008-05-26T16:05:00.000-05:00"Secularism to them is just atheism by another nam..."Secularism to them is just atheism by another name."<BR/><BR/>I agree with your disagreement, mostly.<BR/>At the same time however, there's this statement:<BR/>"intelligent design is just biblical creationism by another name"<BR/><BR/>I would have to say that to the /extent/ the latter is true, the former is true. (and false, false)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com