tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3498725671447004370.post6579709075683724676..comments2023-10-26T07:19:41.446-05:00Comments on Science Avenger: Your God Delusion IndexScienceAvengerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00855046387193200080noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3498725671447004370.post-11512557022341011972009-09-03T23:38:03.652-05:002009-09-03T23:38:03.652-05:00I'm sure that if you tried to analyze the ques...I'm sure that if you tried to analyze the questions and conclusions with an unbiased eye, you'd find a number of problems with the questionnaire. Subtle problems. Though many of the questions were worded just fine, quite a few did not lend themselves to a definite yes or no answer, but rather, "sort of, but not exactly, umm, can you reword that, it's too loaded."<br /><br />Personally, I thought that questions 2 and 3 were repetitive, but I suppose one can argue that each one was needed.<br /><br />Also, if 0-45 is normal, how does one define normal? Obviously it has nothing to do with the percentage of people holding in that range. I guess he gave it his own, "abnormal," definition. heh.<br /><br />Finally, one can tell that the creator of the video had in mind Christians specifically, ignoring other faiths. It's hard to prove, but I get a strong sense that it's true anyway.Legolaslandnoreply@blogger.com